[from Reyn A.]
There's a lot happening with respect to the AFRH development right now. We will have more news in the next couple of days about the HPRB hearing today, and also a copy of a letter from the DC Dept of Transportation that expresses grave concerns about the project.
The Commission of Fine Arts has issued a letter expressing significant concerns about the AFRH’s development plans, rejecting its current proposals and requesting that the AFRH come up with some better alternatives. You can read the full letter here.
Some quoted highlights (note in point three the stated preference for park land in Zones B and C):
1. The Commission emphasized the singular importance of the property and [...] objected to what they characterized as a lack of a clear design concept in the master plan, commenting that it does not satisfactorily enhance the extraordinary resources of the site nor relate well to the surrounding urban context.
2. The Commission members stated numerous concerns with the proposal for Zone A… [noting that it] does little to acknowledge the urban context, including a lack of expression of the North Capitol Street axis in the proposed development […] and leaves the design intention for the new buildings ambiguous with no clear concept… [likewise] that the outer edge should be carefully designed to appropriately address the site's prominent frontage along North Capitol and Irving Streets, proposed to be lined with exposed parking structures.
3. The Commission members were dissatisfied with the proposed design for new development in Zones B and C, questioning whether the relatively small amount of proposed development would be worthwhile... If possible, the Commission encouraged the consideration of retaining these areas as park land with public access.
4. The Commission requested a revised submission of the master plan, including alternative designs for development in Zone A that explore a more coherent approach to the site.
Recent Comments